This deviant's full pageview
graph is unavailable.
Last Visit: 108 weeks ago
This is the place where you can personalize your profile!
By moving, adding and personalizing widgets.
You can drag and drop to rearrange.
You can edit widgets to customize them.
The bottom has widgets you can add!
Some widgets you can only access when you get Core Membership.
Some widgets have options that are only available when you get Core Membership.
We've split the page into zones!
Certain widgets can only be added to certain zones.
"Why," you ask? Because we want profile pages to have freedom of customization, but also to have some consistency. This way, when anyone visits a deviant, they know they can always find the art in the top left, and personal info in the top right.
Don't forget, restraints can bring out the creativity in you!
Now go forth and astound us all with your devious profiles!
The paper industry is peeved at Google right now. An industry organization called "Two Sides" recently published a scathing open letter to the technology giant accusing it of scamming the American people by encouraging them to use less paper in 2013. Our world has become increasingly digitized, and many agree that a reduction in paper use (and thus waste) is good for the planet. More trees = happy Earth, right? Not according to the paper companies.
Two Sides indignantly claims that Google's new initiative is "clearly another example of a self interested organisation using an environmentally focused marketing campaign to promote its services while ignoring its own impact upon the environment." Do they have a point? We'll take a look after the jump.
Initially, hearing the claim that "going paperless" has zero environmental benefit made me incredulous. Who does the paper industry think it is? Don't they know we use about 71 million tons of paper in the U.S. each year and only about 37 percent of the fiber used to make new paper products in the US comes from recycled sources? How could using less paper possibly be bad for the environment?!
"Google's own environmental impact is astounding," the Two Sides letter states, and it's an accusation that's hard to refute. Google uses 2.3 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity a year, most of which is gobbled up by massive data centers. The letter goes on to point out that digital activities, such as conducting a Google search or watching a YouTube video, combine for massive annual energy consumption and carbon emissions as well. Multiplied by the billions of people doing these things thousands of times a year, it's pretty staggering. There's also the nasty reality of e-waste, the fastest growing waste stream in the world. Going digital inevitably requires the purchase of a device which, though it requires no paper, is full of toxic metals and chemicals. Not exactly environmentally-friendly.
Of course, what Two Sides fails to acknowledge in its letter is the significant threat the paper industry poses to old growth forests here in the U.S., as well as rain forests and the endangered animals that live there. There's also no mention of the massive amount of water consumed in the paper making process, and then the water and air that's polluted from the toxic chemicals used to make paper oh-so-white and smooth. And we haven't even started to discuss the nasty inks and dyes used to create paper packaging.
There's also the inconvenient truth that Google is working hard to source energy for its data centers from renewable sources. And while it's certainly not the norm, thousands of families installed solar, wind, and geothermal power systems at their homes and businesses, meaning that the energy powering their digital devices produces almost no negative emissions.
What do you think? Is Google's "Go Paperless" campaign nothing but a self-serving marketing ploy, or is the paper industry just sore about becoming obsolete? Tell us in the comments.